Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.
Madi Margolis: A posthuman figure like the female cyborg challenges traditional humanist feminism in ways that make room for theorizing new subjectivities and feminist epistemologies. In my article, I analyze how Fritz Lang’s Metropolis (1927) offers such a vision of the female cyborg. In the film, the cyborg subject, Maria, is a composite of machine and human—both physical, dependent on the corporal mixing of flesh and machine, and mental, combining human emotional with robotic programming. By viewing this film alongside critical theory, we can understand cyborg-Maria as a subversive, hybrid character. Accordingly, I conclude in my article, the cyborg as a figure subverts and fragments the coherency of narratives that present gender, technology, and identity in monolithic terms, helping us envision new possibilities.
Posted inInterviews|Comments Off on Madi Margolis, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Cyborg Feminism: Ambiguity and Hybridity of the Female Cyborg in Metropolis”
Star Wars: Episode IX – The Rise of Skywalker (Walt Disney Pictures, 2019)
Warning: Review contains mild spoilers for Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker based only on trailers and promotional materials.
Ever since the original Star Wars (George Lucas, 1977) first released in the early summer of 1977, movies have never been the same. From the intense high-production space battles to the exquisite sound of a lightsaber being ignited, there is nothing truly like a Star Wars film. Whether it’s John Williams’s iconic score or the famous opening title crawl, the memories from Star Wars are timeless. Regardless of the varying quality of Star Wars films released, as fans, our love has never wavered. From the classic original trilogy to the abysmal prequel series, Star Wars fans have endured and always returned for more. Even after Disney’s takeover of Lucasfilm in 2012, Star Wars continued to be a roller coaster of quality. The Force Awakens (J. J. Abrams, 2015) showed audiences how to win back the public, Rogue One (Gareth Edwards, 2016) exhibited a new step forward, The Last Jedi (Rian Johnson, 2017) was a much-needed risk that didn’t pay off, and Solo (Ron Howard, 2018) was a pointless entry that no one asked for. Now, nearly forty-two years after the release of A New Hope (George Lucas, 1977), Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (J. J. Abrams, 2019) released on December 20, 2019, officially ending the Skywalker saga. To say the least, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker continues the roller coaster of quality, ending the saga with a dud of misplaced nostalgia, poor writing, and an overall unfinished story that leaves more questions than answers. As good as other recent Star Wars entries (like the Disney Plus series The Mandalorian or Respawn’s video game Jedi Fallen Order) may have been, Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker continues the long-running Star Wars film tradition of taking one step forward and two steps back.
A depiction of the virtual reality experience: an animated image of a motionless man standing on a structure in front of cardboard boxes which move away from him. Asia One (Cao Fei, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, 2018)
Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.
Justine Xi: My article discusses the deviation of two films in style and intention from contemporary independent Chinese filmmakers commonly referred to as the Urban Generation or Sixth Generation. The article specifically points out an “anti-realist” style that is used to critique consumerism (contextualized in China’s rapid technological and economic growth), and also address the legacy of Chinese sociopolitical history in a different manner.
Posted inInterviews|Comments Off on Justine Xi, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Critical Anti-Realism in Chinese Postsocialist Films Chicken Poets (Meng Jinghui, 2002) and Asia One (Cao Fei, 2018)”
Valerie’s earrings enable her to remove herself from danger. Valerie and Her Week of Wonders (Barrandov Studios, Criterion)
Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.
Alexandra Coburn: It’s about this film that was made in the 1960s in what was then Czechoslovakia and now the Czech Republic. It was essentially marketed as a vampire movie about a young woman being stalked by a group of powerful vampires. I noticed that people were talking about it in the context of being made during this specific film movement called the Czech New Wave, but they weren’t talking about it as a feminist text. My paper is essentially revisiting this random Czech film and sort of talking about it as a feminist text and the ways it influenced feminist horror on a larger scale
Posted inInterviews|Comments Off on Alexandra Coburn, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Valerie the Vampire Slayer: Abjection, the Czech New Wave, and Feminist Interventions”
If you’re reading this statement, you likely agree that film, indeed, matters. As we assume our new responsibilities as Film Matters online editorial board during these months of global pandemic and political unrest, we have reflected deeply on how, why, and to what end film matters to us as a collective; and we appreciate the privilege of our role as editors, with capacity to feature undergraduate voices that synthesize, challenge, complicate, and clarify the changing ways that films (and all moving image media) matter in our world. These months have incited fear and anxiety, passion and concern, in all of us. We think about the future; and we envision this online journal as a chance to shape and make it. We imagine this virtual space as a site that might give rise to hope—for us and for you—as we conceive of writing and film as directly linked to the deriving of meaning and hope. We write to articulate our collaborative mission and to give shape to what we feel called to do and make.
In Film Comment, Devika Girish writes beautifully about Kirsten Johnson’s Cameraperson as “a reminder that to write about movies is to write about our encounters with them—to not just contemplate the sky and its bursts of lightning but also to tell the story of one’s gasps and sneezes, even if they end up on the floor of history’s editing room.” We envision Film Matters online as an opportunity to collect and foreground these “encounters.” Toward that end, we welcome submissions from undergraduate students and recent alumni that convey responsibility for not only the ideas therein but also for the forms that this work might take (whether film criticism, scholarship, personal/lyric essays, videographic criticism, and digital storytelling). In other words, we want to publish work that has a real purpose for being, that feels not obligatory and staid but rather bold, engaging, and gratifying for everyone involved. We want to publish pieces that aim to connect with people in the world beyond the screen. We hope to publish pieces that exhibit a sense of how others have written about film (historically, critically, theoretically) alongside a fresh and original voice, such that the writer balances context with vision.
We seek work that resembles what Girish Shambu describes as a “new cinephilia” (Film Quarterly): we want “to multiply a diversity of voices and subjectivities, and a plethora of narratives about cinephilic life and experience.” Shambu’s “new cinephilia” moves beyond “predominantly aesthetic” concerns toward a “deep curiosity about the world and a critical engagement with it.” We agree wholeheartedly that film “teaches us about the human and nonhuman world in new and powerful ways” and aim to produce, solicit, and publish writing that “radiates outward, powered by a spirit of inquiry and a will to social and planetary change.” Shambu closes his manifesto with a call for “a cinephilia that is fully in contact with its present, global moment—that accompanies it, that moves and travels with it.” We share this call, and we hope both to consider what this might look like within our undergraduate community (are there shared concerns unique to us? Can film help us to articulate the nature of our hope and unrest?) and also how we, as students the world around, might be poised uniquely to give voice to—and thereby make shareable—our aspirations and fears as a generation. We are especially interested in publishing experiences and interactions with cinema in our current climate, as shaped by COVID-19, the US presidential election, Black Lives Matter, and calls for and insecurities about social justice the world around.
In addition to working with writers and contributing reviews/essays (as appropriate), we will create a regular column about what we’re watching now, brief essays that address whatever combination of escapism and immersion, of challenge and relief, works for us in a given week; we would love for these columns to inspire our readers to join us in experiencing these media forms. In coming weeks, look for our coverage of Hendrix College’s Windgate Museum of Art’s Let Us March On, a virtual and local exhibit about Black Lives Matter. In our own work and in that which we read, we seek perpetually to privilege approaches that transform and open films (and moving image media) more than approaches that delimit and shut down thinking. Whether revisiting canonical films with a fresh perspective or championing new films, whether pointing out privilege or arguing for its undoing, whether celebrating joyous film experiences or bemoaning the opposite, whether describing iPhone screenings or theatrical exhibitions: we hope to read work that shapes the future, that imagines—as a way toward realizing—what all of us together, at our best, can become.
Posted inHendrix|Comments Off on Film Matters Online: Vision Statement and Guiding Principles. By Sydney Boone, JaZmyn Shambley, and Sophia Stolkey
Pete Davidson in The King of Staten Island (Universal Pictures, 2020)
Judd Apatow’s latest installment, The King of Staten Island (2020), is a semi-autobiographical film about comedian and Saturday Night Live star, Pete Davidson, and his life growing up in Staten Island. The generic elements and tropes of the “coming-of-age” narrative are evident throughout, but are showcased through a twenty-four-year-old bum of a character, versus the typical teenage character so often seen in the genre, which offers a refreshing tone to this branded character type ahead of the film. The comedy begins with Davidson’s character, Scott Carlin, cruising on the highway, lost in his own thoughts and likely in the midst of mental breakdown, causing two cars to crash behind him. Now, this opening scene may appear to be intense and even triggering due to the actions described, but The King of Staten Island’s cinematic style, although suggesting there is something wrong in our first glimpse of the protagonist, also keeps the scene contemporary, as rap music blares through the speakers of the vehicle and cameras home in on Scott’s focused face through the overhead mirror. The casual cinematography and the thunderous sound put us right in the car with Scott and, at first, it is hard for us to tell if it is the music that is what has his full focus or something else. When he starts to blink aggressively, eventually clenching his eyes shut for too many seconds too long, this is where the crash comes in. Undoubtedly, the crash was Scott’s fault but, after seeing him in a such a panicked state for unknown reasons, we want to believe that it was not his fault. It is more than obvious that Scott feels terrible about everything, as he mutters “sorry” to himself as he drives off. Already, this seems to be a habit of our deadbeat son and wannabe tattoo artist protagonist: avoiding every emotional confrontation that life throws at him. The cinematography and editing for this film’s introduction alone already set King of Staten Island’s cinematic style apart from Apatow’s other films, letting the audience know that we are in for a more serious comedy from the start.
Daniel Hillard (Robin Williams) becomes the liminal nanny in order to save his family in Mrs. Doubtfire (Twentieth Century Fox, 1993)
Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.
Sarah Matthews: My research began with a desire to investigate the one-dimensional and often negative on-screen representations of babysitters, as well as the formulaic narratives that have become inseparable from them. I was equally daunted and motivated by the fact that there appeared to be no research dedicated exclusively to this body of work. The major finding of my article is that babysitter films can be categorized into three basic storylines, each of which aims to respond to the gender and generational shifts of their production’s context.
Snapchat filter used to promote Ghostbusters (Columbia Pictures, 2016). THR Staff
Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.
Jason Husak: I really wanted to write an article that showcased the different representations of feminism in film. As a feminist, myself, I find it fascinating how some films use feminism to sell a picture as a tacky new trend rather than as a method to educate and push the conversation further. Specifically, in my article, I explore how Ghostbusters: Answer the Call explores the former by using women as the cheap gimmick to sell the rebooted franchise rather than as vehicles for change in an impactful and progressive way.
Posted inInterviews|Comments Off on Jason Husak, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “I Aint Afraid of No Remake: Exploration of the Financial, Marketing, and Societal Failure of Ghostbusters: Answer the Call”
Film Matters has been moving and shaking this year (if we do say so ourselves!), teaming up with new colleges and universities to expand opportunities for undergraduate authors/editors. We are pleased to announce our latest partnership, with Hendrix College, who will now be responsible for managing our online content here.
Under the expert guidance of Kristi McKim, who has been a longtime member of our advisory board, not to mention the guest editor of several dossiers (both online and in print) over the years, undergraduate students at Hendrix College will serve as joint authors and editors of the Film Matters site. Equally exciting is the mentorship that Hendrix students will provide to their fellow undergraduate authors across the globe – hands-on applied learning in action, as drafts are exchanged between editors and authors. Hendrix students will learn crucial publishing and project management skills on the job. An institution that prioritizes engaged learning, Hendrix College offers a structure within which this Film Matters opportunity beautifully fits as an experience of active learning and pre-professional training.
Kristi McKim, now our Online Editor, is Professor and Chair of English/Film and Media Studies at Hendrix College, where she was honored as the 2014-15 United Methodist Exemplary Professor, nominated for the CASE US Professors of the Year Award, and recently recognized with the 2019-20 Carole Herrick Award for Excellence in Academic Advising. Studying global ecocinema through a phenomenological approach, she has published the books Love in the Time of Cinema (Palgrave Macmillan, 2011) and Cinema as Weather: Stylistic Screens and Atmospheric Change (Routledge, 2013), with essays ranging from the scholarly to personal in journals such as Camera Obscura, Studies in French Cinema, Senses of Cinema, Bennington Review, New England Review, and Bright Lights Film Review. Emerging from a fascination with trees, her current research explores film as natural history.
One of the “Most Innovative Liberal Arts Colleges” (U.S. News & World Report) and one of the nation’s forty “Colleges that Change Lives,” Hendrix College, located in Conway, Arkansas, offers a major and minor in English with a Film and Media Studies track. Chaired by Dr. Joshua Glick, Hendrix’s Film and Media Studies Program positions film, television, and emerging media within aesthetic, technological, and historical contexts. Through taking a wide breadth of courses, students learn to interpret as well as contribute to their media environment through essays, videographic criticism, digital storytelling, curated exhibitions, and long-form filmmaking projects. Hendrix’s English Department also offers tracks in Literary Studies and Creative Writing, which—in tandem with Film and Media Studies coursework—prepare students to read and write a variety of critical and creative forms.
Starting in September 2020, undergraduate students looking for online publication opportunities will now work with Hendrix College, where the newest editorial board looks forward to their submissions. Likewise, filmmakers seeking interview or review coverage. Please email submissions or emails of interest/introduction to:
FilmMattersOnline AT hendrix.edu
Hendrix and Film Matters look forward to working with you on future online reviews and articles!
Posted inHendrix, News|Comments Off on Film Matters Launches Hendrix College Partnership
Maleficent arriving uninvited to the celebration of the birth of Princess Aurora. Sleeping Beauty (Walt Disney Productions, 1959)
Film Matters: Please tell us about your article that is being published in Film Matters.
Suzi Fera: “Purple Reign” Is a stylistic analysis of the use of the color purple in Disney animated feature films. It argues that, until very recently, the color purple is generally reserved for villains and people who do not fit the American and Victorian ideals that Walt Disney promoted.
Posted inInterviews|Comments Off on Suzi Fera, Author of FM 10.3 (2019) Article “Purple Reign: The Contradictory Use of the Royal Color Purple in Disney’s Animated Villains”